The one you keep practicing. All existing styles have something to offer or they would have died out. Some excel at particular types of combat -- ie TKD is known for kicking. Some are more suited to particular body types -- ie judo for a smaller stockier person. But much more important than style are the skills of the individual, and that takes a lot of practice time to develop. So 'best' is the one you enjoy enough to keep practicing in.
'art of coordinated power' - a comprehensive Korean self-defense system involving joint locks, pressure points, throws, kicks, and strikes.
Each of my teachers are different and teach in differing ways, and HKD as an art varies a great deal from teacher to teacher in the range of what is taught and the skills required. My focus is self-defense and self-development. My HKD curriculum is concept-based. That makes it quite different from the attack-based curriculum most teachers use, and in my opinion is easier to learn, maintain, and make practical.
'art of the hand and foot' - the world's most popular martial art, it involves kicks, blocks, and strikes and is also a competitive Olympic sport.
There are a LOT of TKD classes out there. Within the World Taekwondo Federation/USA Taekwondo/Olympic TKD umbrella, they will all follow the same set of forms with the same approximate techniques at the same approximate belt levels. The main differences in my classes are the amount of stress placed on self-development aspects of the art such as the 5 tenets of TKD and family training, and the amount of stress placed on the self defense aspects of the art. The sport aspects and competition aspects are there, but not nearly as important; they are not the focus.
These sorts of comparison questions are answered on the Controversal HKD Faq and Controversial TKD Faq pages.
No, it's a martial art as well. The focus of a particular school may be sport-oriented, self-improvement oriented, forms oriented, or self-defense oriented. The techniques can be used very effectively for self-defense. Even if a particular school is totally sport-oriented and pays no attention to self-defense whatsoever, a student will be in better shape and thus better prepared for an altercation. Beck Martial Arts focus for Taekwondo is self-improvement, self-defense, and fitness oriented.
A Filipino martial art known primarily for weapons training that also involves empty hand strikes, kicks, joint locks, grappling, throws, empty hand forms, and weapon forms.
Grandmaster Anding de Leon's style primarily based on Modern Arnis.
See the Controversial Arnis FAQ.
Also answered in the Controversial Arnis FAQ.
Sure, as long as you have an open mind. Try the BMA version of Hapkido or Taekwondo or Arnis and fit it into your own personal martial art.
I think that martial arts are all about self-defense and self-development, and most MMA is losing out on both. The current boom in mixed martial arts is fine as far as technique goes, but tends to focus totally on competitions and physical skills. Focusing on who's the 'toughest' person means you lose out on all the non-physical benefits of martial arts study; ie self-development. In addition, competitions always limit the techniques; there are always rules. For competition, it makes sense to approach it as picking a few techniques that you can do well and making those few nigh unstoppable. But for effective self-defense, you MUST have the capability to deal with many different situations that are never found in a ring, octagon, or on a mat. I feel that traditional martial arts are the best way to gain skills in self-defense and self-development. Hapkido and Arnis have always had a mixture of strikes and grappling included and cover every range including groundfighting. Go far enough in practically any traditional martial art and you'll find techniques that address all kinds of situations. In my Taekwondo class we train in some nontraditional ways (including groundfighting) and spar under many rulesets. The things I like about MMA are that it is exposing many more people to martial arts than ever before, and that it has woken some people up to the necessity of handing many situations, in particular ground fighting.
I believe the martial arts are about self-defense and self-improvement. All training we do has something to do with one, the other, or both. I am a part-time martial arts instructor holding another full time job; I teach because I love it and want to improve people's lives.
See the Contact page
Rates vary depending on frequency and type of training. See the Pricing area of the About-us page
Yes, in general 6 years and up for TKD and 13 and up for Hapkido and Arnis, with some caveats: - I want to teach martial arts, not rote memorization of a student creed, little Johnny to stand at attention, or how to know his left from right. I am not a babysitter or substitute parent. A child needs to have some empathy - to understand that the kicking and punching they are doing can do damage and put themselves in another's place. He or she must understand when it is acceptable and when it is NOT acceptable to use the techniques. And he or she must have the attention span to function in a group class, the attention span of a child NOT that of a teenager or adult; they must have some focus. For Hapkido and Arnis, while young people can physically perform nearly all the techniques, joint locks are not good for developing bodies. If you just walk through the motions as some teachers have kids do, they do not learn what really happens with the techniques. Also, with joint locks or when dealing with weapons, it takes judgment and experience in the amount of force to use to avoid injury. You don't give a 3 year old a box of matches... Private lessons may be feasible for someone otherwise not a fit for the group class. I have accepted students before outside of the guidelines that have previous training and good focus. Note that there are several schools in the area I can recommend that do a great job with very young kids, both with the socialization aspects (self-discipline, respect, concentration, etc) and solid martial arts. I am happy to point you in their direction for your little ones younger than 6.
Most schools will focus on kids. Some will focus on adults. Few give much thought to the special challenges of teenagers. Adolescents can easily get lost in the sea of kids at many schools. They are very heavily influenced by their peers as they try to find their own identities outside their parents and siblings. They need rules but will push the limits constantly. Treat them as adults and you get more adult behavior. They have a great need for positive role models. They have most of their physical growth and most of their adult intelligence but little emotional intelligence, as puberty hits they are going through all kinds of changes. They often fall prey to bullies (both physical and social), drugs, and bad behavior. They also need physical activities that challenge them to get off the couch and away from the computers. Sports do this, but competitions can go too far. The non natural athlete typically hates group sports. Young males especially can get caught up in the macho beat down aspects of combat and get enamoured with all the posturing silly attitude of being the biggest bada** on the block of most MMA. BMA is a place for learning skills that WORK without all the tattoos and attitudes. They need to get past having something to prove. Young women are typically not taught any self-defense that works until after they hit puberty, and then it is typically all out rape defense. That is fine for the true all out defense situations, but young women also need practical techniques that have a middle ground, to teach the boy they like that no means no without putting him in the hospital or the morgue.
No. Martial arts is used for self-defense and as a last resort. The core principles of Beck Martial Arts is solving problems by peaceful resolution and having the self-confidence to not rely on violent behavior.
Certainly. We teach them skills that will help with their coordination, flexibility and strength. We make sure that the activities we assign are appropriate for the child’s athletic level.
There is a chance of physical injury with any form of exercise. We take very special care to supervise all exercises to see that the students are performing them correctly. Sparring is only performed with protective gear and always in a controlled and safe manner.
Any age. You may not be able to physically do some of the motions in a particular art, but no one is ever too old to start improving their life via the martial arts.
Martial arts instruction is not a commodity; you can't buy the skills at every corner convenience store or strip center dojo. Even if a style and organization has a rigid curriculum every instructor is different and the level of quality will differ immensely. My approach to teaching Hapkido differs a little from my teachers' approach, the same is true for Arnis; and the same is true for Taekwondo. People are individuals and the path to martial art mastery is an individual one. But I can be a guide along that path. If you want to train for self-defense and self-development, you will not find a better teacher. I'm not the most technically skilled martial artist in the world and there are certainly people with higher rank out there teaching. I'm not a natural athlete, nor are most of the people I teach. But practice anything long enough and you get pretty good; and I've been doing and teaching martial arts for over 4 decades while constantly learning and growing.
Only you can answer that; it really depends on what your goals are. All Beck Martial Arts classes help with self-defense and self-development, but the primary focus differs a little among them.
I recommend that you set up a telephone consultation with me and take an introductory private lesson as a first step. But you can also just come show up to a class. You can pick up a uniform (white V-neck or wraparound for HKD or TKD, none needed for Arnis) ahead of time, or you can order one through me. Martial arts shoes are optional but recommended.
No, this is not the Marines! You can start at any time and in any shape. You should of course see a doctor before beginning any exercise program and let me know of any physical limitations you have, but you can begin benefiting from martial arts training immediately. I've had one person lose over 100 pounds after starting training with me, obviously he wasn't in great shape when he began!
Of course. You will need to talk to your doctor about the risks you may incur by performing certain physical movements and let your instructors know what you can't do, but everyone can benefit from martial arts training; it goes well beyond any kind of specific physical motion.
Eagles have long been associated with Hapkido. The high flying bird is considered the king of the air. The golden eagle snatching the arrow out of the air was either the first or second symbol representing the art, and is still used in many HKD organizations. In the USA,the bald eagle represents our nation. I chose the bald eagle as an image to represent Beck Martial Arts because I want be a sterling example of Hapkido in America. This particular image comes from 3 sources: an image I've seen on at least three companies/organizations and believe to be public domain, the drawing skills of Chris Crawford, one of my old students, and some bitmap editing by myself.
Yes, just email Master Beck directly.
Yes, see my YouTube channel.
I teach on a conceptual basis, and the syllabus I use is different from anyone else. There might be a lot of overlapping material with others, but my focus on self-defense
and self-development develops immediately practical fighting skills in a fun cooperative environment.
Depends. Skill and knowledge levels vary greatly between schools, and so do color rank schemes and rank. For Taekwondo or for Arnis, I can look at your current skills and knowledge and make a decision as to where you fit; in nearly all cases you'll keep your current rank and simply learn all my underlying curriculum before advancing. But Hapkido is different. Hapkido varies a great deal from teacher to teacher in the range of what is taught and the skills required. And my HKD curriculum is different enough in its concept based structure from all attack based structures (which means practically all other HKD curriculums) that it doesn't work well to just put someone in. I want a certain rank in my school to mean that person understands and has skill with all the concepts taught below that rank -- ALL of them. So for Beck Martial Arts Hapkido, for almost all incoming Hapkido students, skills may translate, rank does not. I fully respect other organizations, schools, and teacher's training. At a seminar or as a guest in my school you can wear whatever uniform and whatever rank has been conferred on you. But the rank of a regular student in my school means rank INSIDE my school; thus it must be earned WITHIN my school and through me. So even if you come in with a 3rd Dan black belt in Hapkido, I want you to start at white belt, learn my whole curriculum and test for every level before you wear a black belt in my school. In other words, every Hapkido rank worn at my school is earned by testing under me, no rank is ever just given out. Attending every class will certainly help your growth and makes rank advancement more likely, but just as with everything else in life just showing up is not enough. There is one exception to 'starting over' rank wise. If the curriculum and knowledge base of your level from your previous training is close enough to mine, I will allow you to wear your current rank with a single white stripe. The stripe signifies that you haven't yet learned the entire curriculum and haven't yet tested for me, but you are close. You will not need to test for every underlying rank separately, but your next test will be comprehensive over my curriculum. This category would apply to for instance some of my students from before my change to a conceptual curriculum, or to certain Sin Moo Hapkido students. Now lest you think this 'starting over requirement' is a scam to get testing fees, I do NOT have time-in-grade requirements for rank, my testing fees are almost nominal, and you may test for more than one level at a time paying 1 test fee. You do NOT have to go through every single level paying the testing fee and waiting three months between testings. For instance, you may come in with 10 years previous HKD experience and an existing 3rd Dan from say the IHF. You start at white belt 10th Gup. Maybe you're ready at the next testing and test for 9th - 2nd Gups, paying $100. Then you wear a red belt 2nd Gup. The next testing maybe you're ready and test for 1st Gup and 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Dan, paying $150 (if you want Sin Moo HKD Association 3rd Dan cert, that org's cert. fee also). At that point you've been tested on ALL rank requirements from white belt through 3rd Dan -- you've EARNED 3rd Dan rank in my school. I do believe in SOME aspects of 'time-in-grade'. Certain concepts and skills take time to develop and to sink in, and there is more to martial arts mastery than just physical skills. I do believe that in general without previous MA training it should take about 4 years to get 1st Dan in HKD and about a year/Dan level to advance after that. But if you've put in 10 years of training in some other martial art; you've mastered a lot of concepts that carry over and it should be MUCH faster. Especially if it's a Hapkido related art such as Kuk Sool or Hwarangdo.
Seminars and video are great training tools, but awarding rank via those avenues is in general a bad idea. Testing via video is too easily staged; you can too easily just record the one time in a hundred you do something right. And repetition to acquire muscle memory is absolutely essential. So if the material shown at a seminar is not practiced enough over time, it is lost. Ongoing regular practice with a good instructor will correct mistakes in your practice and stop bad habits from being ingrained. But a seminar here and a seminar there is not going to do much more than give you an idea of the material. Thus I feel that doing rank tests at a seminar that simply test what's been worked on at that seminar is a bad practice. It tends to promote memorization of the particular techniques done just before, without understanding principles behind the techniques or being able to apply the techniques to different situations. My rank tests deal with understanding of and skill with the concepts I'm teaching; every test is different and you don't know for sure what particular attack will be coming.
In US culture generally it means martial arts expert. That has become watered down over the years with schools selling black belt contracts and guarantees of rank. In Asian culture generally it just means a serious student. To me, black belt in a style means that you have a solid level of understanding of all the basics of that style, and enough physical skills to defend yourself effectively using the style. For Hapkido, that means skills in joint locks, kicking, striking, pressure points, and throws. You don't have to have a perfect tornado spin kick. But you do have to be able to do some basic kicking to earn a black belt in HKD or TKD. If you're a paraplegic, you may be able to become a great martial artist with fantastic hand techniques and a wealth of knowledge; but sorry, kicking is part of the style and part of the objective measures for rank. Everyone can gain from martial arts training; not everyone can become a black belt.
Only if you have the right attitude. Physical fighting is condoned in civilized human society only in self-defense or in defense of others; it is always a last resort. As thinking human beings, we have an obligation to use logic and principles to handle every situation, and as citizens, to follow the existing rule of law. At Beck Martial Arts an explicit part of our student creed is never to fight to achieve selfish ends -- developing the proper attitude is an integral part of our training. The physical skills we teach are very effective in a fight, but more important are the mental skills to avoid one in the first place.
Not at all. Every kind of sparring has rules, and a fight does not. Sparring can help you develop fighting skills, but the mentality is very different. There are aspects to a fight that simply can not safely be experienced in sparring.
Your reaction if surprised. Your reaction to being attacked in the first place. Your reaction to being severely hurt. Your reaction to severely hurting another person, ie actually breaking an arm. Legal repercussions like assault charges. Escalation of the fight to different levels, ie weapons.
Many reasons. To develop distancing skills, timing skills, adapt to changing conditions, to overcome pain, to overcome fear of contact, to practice at full speed with a non-cooperating partner, to experience at least part of the adrenalin rush that comes about, etc. Competitive sparring aids in building good character traits such as sportsmanship, goal setting and achieving, self-control, perseverance, and self-confidence. Also, it is essential for self-defense to be able to handle realistic attacks, where the exact attack is not known in advance, and the attacker doesn't just stop after one attack. Sparring can develop those abilities. And it can be a very fun game, especially for kids.
Because it is simply not safe to spar competitively with joint locks in the equation -- someone will always be trying to out-tough the other guy --which means injuries. People can do full-speed full-contact sparring in Olympic Taekwondo safely because of limiting the target areas, limiting the allowed attacks, and wearing protective gear. People can do full-speed full power throws in judo safely by limiting the types of throws. But with a full speed full power joint lock the opponent either cooperates or the joint is broken. A Hapkidoist can do TKD type sparring using some of his or her HKD striking/kicking skills, and can do judo sparring using some of his other HKD throwing skills; but the core of HKD is joint locks. Also, the mindset of Hapkido is defensive, not aggressive. Sparring rules are always geared to the more aggressive person - he who attacks more usually has a greater number of successful attacks. In Hapkido we don't attack someone else; we take their attack and use it against them. It's not about hitting someone else more times or harder than he hits you; it's about stopping them from hitting you at all. We develop self-defense skills by different kinds of drills, including some with realistic attacks in which the defender doesn't know what kind of attack is coming or when it's coming, and where the attacker continues attacking until either controlled or disabled. The philosophical ideal is to merge with the opponent's attack defusing its power and taking control of the person immediately, whether via joint lock, disabling throw, or disabling strike. In other words, we finish fights as quickly as possible.
Primarily we do Olympic rules Taekwondo sparring (as governed by USA Taekwondo, formerly the United States Taekwondo Union). Those rules allow the realism of full speed and full power, while the limited target areas and protective gear keep things safe. For children the amount of power is also limited and strikes to the head are disallowed. However, the way you train is the way you tend to fight. If you NEVER do any other kind of sparring, you're unlikely to make use of techniques and weapons disallowed under Olympic rules. So we will also do some point-stop sparring as in open Karate tournaments, kickboxing rules sparring, Arnis/Wing Chun type trapping hands sparring, grappling with simple takedowns and defenses, ground grappling, submission wrestling, and some UFC type MMA sparring (not all in one class of course!) But we are always cognizant of safety; we always wear protective gear and always go under control.
We'll do some limited sparring drills in addition to many reaction drills and back and forth partner drills. We do some limited freestyle step sparring training, and a set of pre-arranged stick sparring sequences. But full-contact freestyle stick sparring is *extremely dangerous*, the speed and hardness of the weapons makes it very difficult to do in a controlled manner, and limiting techniques to make it safe also makes it unrealistic. There's some additional discussion in the Controversial Arnis FAQ.
It's difficult to know what the actual facts are -- even when there are written records, sometimes the writers are biased. Although I've used books, web sites, mailing lists, questions to my teachers, etc, I am not a trained historian, and I don't claim that these answers are the be all end answers to these questions. But they are MY answers to these questions based on what I've experienced, seen, and heard from multiple sources in nearly four decades of studying martial arts. If something I say makes you mad, I'm easy to find. :)
Most of these questions involve differing views of history. To me this is all pretty unimportant. One, Arnis is a martial art that has changed and continues to change with the times; with different training methods, influences from other martial arts, and influences from non-Filipino cultures too. Two, the term 'art' in martial art implies creativity and individual expression. Every instructor teaches a little bit differently, and every student will find certain techniques just work better for them than others, so every martial art becomes an individual martial art. What works well for my teacher may not work as well for me, and what works well for me may not work well for you. I can teach you my interpretation of Arnis, but I encourage you to use that as a base and eventually develop your own interpretation. What matters is that you train to meet your goals, not who created that particular method of training or what organization you're in.
For what it's worth, my background in Filipino Martial Arts is: 4 summer camps with Professor Remy Presas in 1993-6. over 30 years of study with Grandmaster Anding, since 1993. Direct seminars and training with GM Ernesto Presas, Datu Tim Hartman, Datu Dieter Knuttel, GM Dan Anderson, GAT Puno Abundio Baet, GM Art Miraflor, and Guro Dan Inosanto. Indirect DVD/video/books influences from the Dog Brothers, Angel Cabales, and Mike Inay.
You can see my complete martial arts background on the MA Resume page.
They are almost entirely the same; all referring to Filipino martial arts that share many many characteristics. All train with stick, knife, double sticks, stick and dagger, and empty hand. All have central ideas of using triangular footwork, continuous flow of movement, the same base movements translating between empty hand and any weapon, and of grouping attacks into angles. The differences are minor, more dependent on the teacher than anything else. For instance, Professor Presas used 12 striking angles, his brother Ernesto used 14. They are often combining things from other martial arts, ie Escrido and v-jitsu combine arnis and jujitsu. Some people like the term 'kali' best because the term 'eskrima' came from Spanish for skimish and 'arnis' came from Spanish 'arnes de mano'.
How far back do you want to go? Some trace the history of FMA back to LapuLapu, who was a hero to the Filipinos because he led the group that killed Magellen. Some go back to silat, which was created as a compilation of martial arts from 6 of Alexander the Great's bodyguards from different backgrounds. Some go on back to Daruma/Boditharma, the founder of Buddism, who brought training techniques from India to the Shaolin Temple in China. Truth is people have ALWAYS fought each other, some have always been better at it than others, and some were able to systemize and teach it. Every system then has had other influences and changed many times over the years. Every individual teacher changes things in some way; even if you're trying to teach exactly the same; you will teach what you personally like to do differently than you'll teach stuff you don't like. And show two different people the same technique and they'll interpret and perform it differently.
The Phillipines consists of over 7000 islands, with MANY different languages and dialects used; therefore there are many names for the same things. Arnis is probably the most widely used term because of the standardization of Modern Arnis and it being used as physical education through school.
The Filipinos always had impressive stick and knife skill; using what they had available. When the Spanish occupied the Phillipines, the training the locals were doing went underground. They started putting training and techniques into the 'moro moro' plays; where the Spanish characters wore leather armor. Arnes de mano means 'harness of the hand', referring to the leather worn on the wrist and forearms of the Spanish characters. The Filipinos were impressed with the techniques the Spanish were doing with sword and dagger, and folded them in to their existing techniques. Eventually this term became 'arnis'.
Arnis de Leon is 95% or so the same as the Modern Arnis Professor taught in the Phillipines before tweaking things to appeal to the short attention spans of seminar training in the US. GM deLeon had a much more structured Modern Arnis curriculum than what the Professor taught in the seminar settings, and GM deLeon has changed some drills and stressed some different things in creating Arnis de Leon. Similarly, in BMA Arnis my curriculum is 90-95% the same material as in Arnis de Leon, but I am teaching in a more conceptual manner. I have taken out the empty hand forms, preferring to do the applications with partners; have added certain drills from other sources, and am focusing more on empty hand locks from multiple places than GM deLeon does. My arnis is certainly based on what I learned directly from Grandmaster de Leon and from Professor Presas, but has also had influence from Dan Inosanto, the Dog Brothers, GM Ernesto Presas, Mike Inay, and others. And it is of course influenced also by my background in Hapkido and Taekwondo. It is not a mixture of arts however, they are separate arts with different approaches and cultural flavors, and I teach them that way. There are many positives to cross-training and mixing arts; but all techniques must fit into the structure and approach of the style if you are calling it by the style's name. In my case the Arnis I teach definately has the ideas of flow and translation between empty hands and weapons true to any FMA style. I believe it to be true to Professor Presas' approach and to GM deLeon's approach.
Actually I *DO* like forms, and I like much that is in the Modern Arnis empty hand forms. But they always seemed to me to be added in so that Modern Arnis people could also compete in forms at open karate tournaments. They're certainly not worthless; practically all the applications out of the forms are things that I teach included in empty hand defense versus punches, kicks, grabs, etc. But IMO as a way to remember techniques they are too repetitive and not comprehensive enough. Nor is there a progression of skill building as you go through them. They are just not that good a teaching tool.
A valid question, because the same complaints can apply to the stick forms of being too repetitive and not comprehensive enough to serve as a catalog of technique. The other stick form sets I've seen, for example Dos Pares, are not really any better, tending to too much impractical twirling. Maybe someday I'll come up with my own set that I like better, but at this point I'm staying with them. The Modern Arnis set using singlestick, doublestick, knife, and espada y daga does give a good idea of a student's level of power, balance, flow, weapon control, and live hand skills.
Nobody who ever saw the Professor in person would ever denigrate his skill or his art. But after he left the Phillipines, Professor Presas traveled around the world doing 1-day and 3-4 day seminars hosted by instructors of other martial arts, and did rank tests at those seminars. So you have a lot of people whose base is something else that obtained rank pretty easily in Modern Arnis. Seminar training in itself is fine; much can be taught and learned in them. But for anything physical, repetition enough to acquire muscle memory is absolutely essential. If the material shown at a seminar is not practiced enough over time, it is lost. Ongoing regular practice with a good instructor will correct mistakes in your practice and stop bad habits from being ingrained. Nor is there time enough in seminars to go through all the variants of a concept or technique. A seminar will give you a decent idea of the material, but rank tests during them tends to promote memorization of the particular technique examples just taught. People often come out with rank without necessarily understanding of the principles behind the techniques or being able to apply them to different situations. In my case I thought that what the Professor taught in the summer camps was great, but was uncomfortable with after my second one being graded to a brown belt level. So I did not test in the 3rd and 4th camps I did with him (1995-6) where others were promoted to black belt levels and I went back through everything step by step with GM de Leon, testing for black belt with GM de Leon years later in 1999
The last couple of years before the Professor died, he was modifying things in his seminars to basically put EVERYTHING into a mock sparring format called tapi-tapi, meaning counter for counter. Masters of Tapi-Tapi is referring to people that learned this set of drills. Historically, the basic idea is simply locking the opponent up using his own arms and/or stick and countering what he's likely to do. From an old guard Modern Arnis point of view, they learned an earlier version and it is to them like saying 'Master of Hubad', or 'Master of Sinawali'; it's just one of MANY drills. So some have the attitude of 'that's all you know'? The new guys say everything is there within it and it's a great way to learn flow. I saw some of it in my final summer camp with the Professor and now have trained with it in a couple seminars. My opinion is that it is a very useful drill, but you still need to train substantially with a lot of other drills. It's very challenging mentally with the use of the live hand and needs a LOT of muscle memory repetition to get. It really seems designed for defeating the skilled fighter, as opposed to the typical self-defense 90% situations. The more I see and do of it the more I like it, but it is HARD to do! I'm not yet to the point of putting it into my syllabus; I don't know it well enough yet plus it looks very difficult for beginners to pick up; hard to see how it works in a curriculum. My opinion may change as I get better and train more with it; that's happened before with other things.
For instructor certification in Modern Arnis, Professor Presas would do a basic instructor certificate for people at the end of a single summer camp; an advanced instructor certificate after two. But he also did belt rank tests did at the seminars; typically testing people after one camp to a green belt level, after two to a brown belt level, and after three to black belt. Note that Lakan (black belt) is a separate rank than Lakan Isa (first degree black belt). Arnis de Leon has the same approach of basic and advanced instructor certification; but more time training and teaching is required than the Professor had; and you need at least brown belt rank before you can obtain the advanced instructor certification. For titles, in Arnis de Leon, the term 'Guro' just means teacher, anyone teaching arnis can assume that title. The term 'Punong Guro' means lead teacher, head instructor, or school owner. The term 'Tuhon' is the closest equivalent to Grandmaster or Founder, meaning the leader of a system or organization; in the Phillipines that's what the students referred to Professor Presas as before he took the title Professor. Some organizations tie particular amounts of experience and rank to these titles, for instance Pekita Tirsia has very specific requirements. Another title you hear sometimes in Arnis circles for leaders of organizations is 'Datu', which a few top students of the Professor use; this means 'chief' or that there is no one of higher rank. This term ties back to Filipino history where 10 datus came from Borneo and settled in the Phillipines bringing in some major cultural influence.
It's not as bad as Ed Parker's Kenpo or Taekwondo, but since Professor Presas's death his organization splintered and there are a number of groups out there for Modern Arnis. The two that came directly out of the Professor's International Modern Arnis Federation after his death are headed by GM Jeff Delaney (Dripping Springs, Texas, www.professorpresas.com), and Master Randi Schea (Houston, Texas, www.modernarnis.net). Schea is no longer involved; the organization is led by a commmittee of students of the Professor from his later years, including Masters Chuck Gauss, Ken Smith, and Earl Tullis. Other major groups that were formed prior to the Professor's death are headed by Datu Tim Hartman (New York, www.datuhartman.com), Datu Dieter Knuttel (Germany, www.dieterknuettel.de/), and Professor Dan Anderson (danandersonkarate.com). There's also a group run by Remy P. Presas, one of the Professor's sons (www.modernarnis.com). I've met and trained before in seminars with GM Delaney, Datu Hartman, Master Gauss, Master Tullis, Datu Knuttel, GM Anderson, and seen video of GM Remy P. Presas. All of them are greatly skilled with a lot to share; realistically I don't think it matters much what organization you join; to me the differences are minor. In my case GM deLeon is local to me and I am proud to be associated with his organization, the International Arnis de Leon Federation. If I had to make a recommendation I'd make it based on location; who is close enough for you to train with most often?
Yes! Jackie and Kevin Bradbury are longtime friends that have a school in the Kansas City area and have put together a website to help people find teachers that come from out of Professor Presas tree including any Modern Arnis offshoots. The site is Presas Legacy | Presas Arnis Instruction.
In a way, but I would say that if you WANT to be a knifefighter you're an idiot. We do not have a knife culture in the US; pocket knives maybe but if you're carrying a Rambo type one around you are probably carrying illegally! Realistically, if you are deliberately facing off with someone where both of you are armed with knives, you're both acting like idiots. Both of you WILL be cut unless there is a HUGE difference in skill, probably at least one of you will be maimed, and there's a good chance of one or both of you dying. Knife fighting to see who is best is stupid; you should only fight with lethal weapons when it is in defense of your own life (or your family). I train people to deal with emptyhand, stick, and knife attacks; and have enough knowledge of how those weapons can be used to have a better chance at self-defense.
We do a lot of stick versus stick training in arnis for skill development, but we are not training for competition. The usual competitions have so much padding that a lot of practical techniques are lost; and if you go without pads there are really high risks. Stick fighting is DANGEROUS! As with knife fighting, doing it without protection is stupid! However, with padded sticks it is possible to spar with a decent amount of realism, and that is worthwhile to pressure test your techniques. I train people to deal with emptyhand, stick, and knife attacks; and have knowledge of how those weapons can be used enough to have a better chance at self-defense. Sticks are HUGELY practical weapons; the first weapon cave-man picked up was probably a stick.
I like a lot of what they do, but I think they're kind of nuts! I appreciate what they've done in finding out what really does and doesn't work in realistic conditions, but I wouldn't want to risk myself that way! They've had a major influence on me teaching the mechanics of power to beginners right away and putting heavy stress on it. But to actually fight like they do is too risky for more than very very few people -- almost everyone has to go to work the next day.
It's difficult to know what the actual facts are -- even when there are written records, sometimes the writers are biased. Although I've used books, web sites, mailing lists, questions to my teachers, etc, I am not a trained historian, and I don't claim that these answers are the be all end answers to these questions. But they are MY answers to these questions based on what I've experienced, seen, and heard from multiple sources in three decades of studying martial arts. If something I say makes you mad, I'm easy to find. :)
For what it's worth, my background in Hapkido described on the MA Resume page. Most of these questions involve differing views of history. To me this is all pretty unimportant. One, Hapkido is a martial art that has changed and continues to change with the times. Two, the term 'art' in martial art implies creativity and individual expression. Every instructor teaches a little bit differently, and every student will find certain techniques just work better for them than others, so every martial art becomes an individual martial art. I can teach you my interpretation of Hapkido, but I encourage you to use that as a base and eventually develop your own interpretation. What matters is that you train to meet your goals, not who created that particular method of training.
I have capitalized family names and used the Western approach of placing them last; you'll often see them reversed in the Asian way.
David N. Beck, Texas
Sometimes not all that much; there has been a LOT of cross-pollinization.
Virtually everyone in Korea gets some Taekwondo training (it's their national sport - ever know an American boy who'd NEVER played baseball?). The specialty jumping spinning kicks of Hapkido proved very useful for demonstration and breaking purposes and got adopted into Taekwondo. Any Hosinsool (self-defense) techniques involving joint locks or throws you see in Taekwondo got adopted in from out of Hapkido. Even though TKD is more known for kicking than HKD, HKD has a wider variety of kicks. But on the flip side, any HKDists that want to spar tend to do so under TKD rules and adapt their techniques accordingly. There's a lot of mixed versions out there; although typically a LOT heavier on the TKD side; TKD is easier to learn and easier to market. Go far enough in either and you'll learn some of the other one, so how much does it really matter? In general, if sport oriented, it's Taekwondo; and if self-defense oriented, it's Hapkido.
Nothing, if it's used properly. There are many many more TKD type places than HKD, and many schools do some sort of mix; doing some Hapkido as the self-defense part of their curriculum. I've attended, hosted, and taught many seminars and much can be learned from them. But for myself and for the vast majority of people, learning something well takes time. For anything physical, repetition to acquire muscle memory is absolutely essential. So if the material shown at a seminar is not practiced enough over time, it is lost. Ongoing regular Hapkido practice with a good instructor will correct mistakes in your practice and stop bad habits from being ingrained. But a seminar here and a seminar there is not going to do much more than give you an idea of the material. Thus I feel that doing rank tests at a seminar that simply test what's been worked on at that seminar is a bad practice. It tends to promote memorization of the particular techniques done just before, without understanding principles behind the techniques or being able to apply the techniques to different situations. And to me, that's like someone playing scales versus someone playing music. If it's rote technique, you're not a martial artist.
Some sources will say Yong Sool CHOI(1904-1986), some will say Han Jae JI. My answer is Ji, and call Choi the 'father' of Hapkido.
Because all the branches of Hapkido go back to Choi and Choi was Han Jae JI's primary teacher. Yong Sool CHOI was taken to Japan as a young boy and supposedly became an adopted son of the famous Daito-Ryu Aiki jujitsu martial artist Sokaku TAKEDA (1860-1943). He supposedly was with Takeda until Takeda's death, after which Choi returned to Korea and shortly thereafter opened a school.
Choi always claimed he learned from Takeda, yet none of the Takeda family say they remember him. Takeda kept meticulis records of those he trained down to the level of exactly what technique he taught who and how much he charged for it. Yet none of the names Choi used appears in the records, and there ARE some Korean names there, including at least one with a teaching license. Choi claimed to have teaching licenses from Takeda, but said the bag he had them in was stolen from him at a train station on his arrival in Korea after Takeda's death.
It was common at the time for Korean children to be taken into rich Japanese households as servants. Perhaps Choi was a servant in the household and around (carrying the bags, etc) but not an actual participant in Takeda's seminars. But you would certainly expect the family to remember him, and they say no. As far as an adopted son, perhaps Choijust looked on Takeda as a father figure and there's been some mistranslation in interviews. Culturally, adoption of any Korean into a Japanese family would be VERY unlikely. There were other teachers of Daito-ryu aikijujitsu,I think that perhaps Choi was a second generation student of Takeda rather than first generation. Regardless of where and from whom he learned, Choi was a formidable martial artist when he returned to Korea after Takeda's death.
Because Ji came up with the name, added many different things to the art, and is most responsible for the spread of Hapkido. Between 70-80% of the Hapkido branches can be traced back to Ji. Choi actually directly taught very few people because he always charged very high rates and the training was very severe. Choi never taught high, spinning, or jumping kicks; cane, staff, or other weapons; or breathing exercises -- these things were added by Ji. Most new martial arts styles come from some one person studying several different arts under several teachers, merging some things and modifying others, and then teaching the result under a new name. Choi never claimed to have studied with any other teacher than Takeda, and never modified what he taught.
Han Jae JI began martial arts training in 1949 at the age of 13 with Choi in Seoul. He trained for 7 years full time with Choi. Ji learned meditation techniques, weapons, and Tae Kyun kicking from a man he know as Wise-Man Lee starting at age 18. He learned more meditation techniques from a lady Taoist monk he knew only as Grandma. He was still training with Choi during this time as well.
Ji moved to his hometown of Andong, opening a school there (the An Moo Kwan) as a 3rd Dan in 1956. He taught Yoo Kwon Sool there for 9 months, then moving to Seoul and opening a school at a tie factory he called the 'Sung Moo Kwan'. He gained more students and soon was able to teach from a boxing gym. He added techniques to deal with boxing style punches at this time.
In 1958, Ji moved his school to Joong Boo Shi Jang where he continued teaching until April of 1960. During this period, Ji began to add basic kicking and punching techniques taken from other Korean schools and his Tae-Kyun training. In 1959 he decided that his system was sufficiently different from Choi's culturally patterned Japanese aiki-jiu jitsuto call it 'Hapkido'.
Into the early 60's, Ji was merging in techniques and modifying his curriculum. A fellow student of Choi's and good friend of Ji's, Moo-Woong KIM, gave input and advice during 8-9 months in 1961 to help finalize the kicking curriculum. Kim had also trained in Tae-Kyonand was a noted kicker.
Ji offered Choi use of the name and Choi thereafter taught using 'hapkido' as the name until his death in 1986. Choi continued always with his original teachings, which meant that most of the striking, kicking techniques and weapons techniques were omitted.
Choi didn't care what it was called. He called it 'yawara' at first. Then 'Dai Dong Ryu Yu Sool', the Korean equivalent of Daito-Ryu Aikijujitsu.Many of Choi's students had backgrounds from other martial arts, and Korean names were desired rather than Japanese names. So it became 'Dai Dong Ryu Yu Kwon Sool',then 'Hapki Yu Kwon Sool',then eventually 'Hapkido'.
No, it's more a matter of degree. Ji is directly responsible for the differences between HKD and Daito-RyuAikijujitsu, including the name, and at least 70% of HKD lineage is his. Choi is not responsible for any differences between TKD and its karate forebears with the exception of the sinewave (done only in ITF TKD) and a few ITF forms, he may or may not be responsible for the name Taekwondo, and his percentage of TKD lineage is less than 10%. And even that percentage would more properly be credited to Tae Hi Nam. See the Controversial TKD FAQ for more on this subject.
Aikido founder Morehi USHIBA studied with Sokaku TAKEDA for a number of years as well as a number of other teachers before forming Aikido. The simularity of technique is very apparent between the two arts in the circular non-resistive motions, joint-locking and throwing. Both even are written with the same Chinese characters. However, the philosophy is different in that a Hapkidoist mixes in hard with the soft, including kicks and strikes; plus the footwork tends to be a little different. Possibly CHOI never directly studied with TAKEDA but only watched (and Aikidoist swear the hakamas - which block viewing of the feet). Or possibly the cross-influence of other Korean kicking/punching arts with Hapkido modified the footwork. There has been enough crosstraining influence over the years that it's very hard to track. There have been HKDists that studied Aikido and Aikidoists that studied Hapkido, with the primary crossover influence being Hapkido Grandmaster Jae Nam MYONG. Myong founded the International Hapkido Federation (one of the top 3 HKD organizations in Korea) and became the International Aikido Federation representative in Korea.
None. The same Chinese written characters are used for Hapkido and Aikido. In the early 60's, President Chung Hee PARK lifted import restrictions from Japan and Ji came across a book on Aikido and noticed this for the first time. He didn't like them having the same name and dropped the 'Hap' from his art. In 1963 the Korean government granted a charter through the Ministry of Education to create the Korea Kido Association, with Choias Chairman and Jung Yoon KIM as First Secretary. The majority of Ji's students didn't like the name change and many kept calling it Hapkido, plus Ji and Kim did not get along. By 1965 Ji was in the politically powerful position of Chief Instructor for the President's Security Forces and left the Kido Association to establish the Korean Hapkido Association. The Korea Kido Association retained many members and became something of an umbrella organization for Korean martial arts that did not want to associate themselves with Taekwondo and the Kukkiwon. It has expanded to become the World KiDo Federation, and now it contains Hapkido, Kuk Sool Won, Hwarangdo, Tuk Gong Mool Sool, etc. at least 31 styles at last count. It is headed by GM In Sun SEO, whose brother In Hyuk SUH founded Kuk Sool. It remains one of the three major hapkido organizations in Korea.
Not much, mostly more palm heel strikes and Chinese weaponry training from Southern Praying Mantis. Any other differences appear to be in the trappings; fancier uniforms, stressing flashier techniques, etc. In Sun SEO studied Hapkido with Yong Sool Choi and earned a black belt in 1958. The founder of Kuk Sool Won, In Hyuk SUH, is SEO's older brother (same name pronounced 's uh', they just spell it differently in English). Suh claims that everything in Kuk Sool is from his grandfather handed down from generation to generation from original Korean royal court martial arts, that he never studied with Hapkido with Choi or kung fu with Monk Hae Dong and Wang Tae-eui. But Suh is extremely nationalistic, and discounts everything non-Korean. He sees Choi's HKD as Japanese daito ryu aiki jujitsu, and kung fu as Chinese. I think that Suh can perhaps justify to himself saying that he never trained with Choi because it came through his brother. But you look at the techniques and Kuk Sool Won is Hapkido with a few other things added in. For many years Kuk Sool schools even went by the name Kuk Sool Hapkido.
Not much. The founder of Hwarangdo, Dr. Joo-Bang Lee studied Hapkido in private lessons with Choi and also visited and trained in many Hapkido schools, including training with Moo-woong Kim and In HyukSuh, founder of Kuk Sool. He claims to have merged a little HKD with secret techniques taught to him and his brother Joo Sang Lee by a monk named Sahm Dosa to create Hwarang-do. Supposedly the techniques were secretly handed down through 57 generations of warrior/monks since the Silla dynasty and the days of the hwarang. Dr. Lee had his own school as early as 1960, and was promoted to 8th degree by Yong Sool Choi at the same time as Han Jae JI in May of 1968, so his skill level was certainly superlative. From 1961-68 he called his school a Hapkido school.
But shortly after that he supposedly got permission from Sahm Dosa to teach the 'secret techniques', founded Hwarangdo, and moved to the USA. Actual differences to Hapkido appear to be in the trappings -- more philisophical and Korean cultural stuff based on the historical hwarang, some forms and more strikes than is typical in HKD, and more weapons training. But all the self-defense techniques in his 3-book series are HKD. And the forms and teaching methodologies are very similar to Kuk Sool. How much stock to put in the 'secret techniques' and the 57 generations handed down from monk to monk -- well, I won't say it's *impossible*, just extremely unlikely. I will add that the reputation of Kuk Sool and Hwarangdo is that of 'dojang technique' heavy- typically fancy impractical stuff. However, I've seen and felt the technique of In Sun SEO and some of his top people and they can make it work. And Taejoon Lee appears to be adapting his father's art to meet today's needs in training with modern weapons.
In the late sixties the Korea Hapkido Association President was Woo Joong KIM, also president of the Dae Woo Company which had many interests in the Middle East. Many HKD instructors went there and taught police forces and military officers. The founder of Krav Maga was a very skilled Israeli boxer and wrestler that participated in some of this training, studied some other martial arts as well, and boiled his knowledge down into a very simple quick to learn practical system to teach the Israeli armed forces. The style looks like some basics from a number of martial arts including HKD. It's a good fighting system; it's very hard for me to call it a martial art. There's little creativity or flexibility; it's drill drill drill to install muscle memory and blast the opponent, there's no art involved. It's immediate destruction no nonsense stuff, great for a sentry in the military; not so good for graduated levels of response necessary for policemen or for the general person in today's society. I would say the same thing about Haganah, or so many of the xyz 'combatives' self-defense courses that are out nowadays.
In 1967 the KHA sent 15 members of demonstration teams to Vietnam and taught Korean, US, and Vietnamese troops and special forces. Viet No Vuem is the Vietnamese martial art that appeared shortly thereafter, coming from out of that training. Viet No Vuem appears to be basic HKD with some TKD mixed in, plus the advanced acrobatic falls and rolls from Hapkido.
Han Moo Do is Dr. He-Young KIMM's combination of Hapkido, Kuk Sool, and Taekwondo. Dr. Kimm is a HKD pioneer in the US, a scholar, a historian, and the author of the Hapkido Bible. Train with him if you ever get the chance.
Hankido is Jae Nam MYONG's combination of Hapkido and Aikido. Introduced in 1992, it tries to be an easy-to-learn martial art. Myong was the head of the International Hapkido Federation. Myong died in 1999 and his IHF is led by his son Sung Kwang Myong. This IHF is actually a 3-pronged organization that teaches with the martial arts of Hapkido under the banner of International Hapkido Federation, Hankido under the banner of the International Hankido Federation, and Hankumdo(Korean sword) under the banner of the International Hankumdo Federation. A lot of IHF's already, plus there are at least two other totally unrelated International Hapkido Federations, one led by the late Bong Soo HAN and another by James Benko.
There are many, there's no clearly dominant one like TKD has in the WTF. The joke is that the first thing a Korean does when opening a school in the US is start his own organization... Anyway, I've listed only ones I know something about; there are many more. Note: the same word in Korea is used for 'federation' or 'association', so some of these can be confusing.
American Hapkido Association - Chong Min LEE American Hapkido Association - Mike Wollmershouser Wollmershouser was a student of Choi's, his bio says the highest ranking American ever taught by Choi. He was active in the northeast U.S. There was a video series he put out in the 1980's that I've seen one or two of; cheap quality tapes but excellent techniques shown, well worth getting if you can find them. He died some years ago of cancer.
International Hapkido Federation - James Benko, Ph. D
International Combat HKD Federation - John Pelligrini. Pelligrini has the reputation of having taken out much of the Hapkido curriculum and primarily markets to martial artists of other styles, focusing on seminar training. It is my opinion and that of many others that this is a disservice to HKD, making it easy to get HKD rank and encouraging a picture of it as an adjunct style rather than the complete martial art it is. Having seen his videos, my opinion of his skill level is that it is nowhere near grandmaster level. My understanding is he was a TKD guy that did some seminars with Mike Wolmershouser and received an HONORARY 1st Dan black belt in Hapkido given at a seminar in 1988, then bounced around organization to organization attending seminars and jumping up in rank; emerging with an 6th Dan when he created the ICHF in 1992, and shortly thereafter getting an 8th Dan from In Sun SEO. I guess since he was able to gain rank quickly by seminars and changing organizations he's happy to do the same for others. For what little it's worth, I started Hapkido before he did. I started training in Hapkido in 1983, tested for my 1st Dan in 1987, followed my organizations guidelines in going through the ranks one by one never skipping any, and I received 6th Dan in June 2005 (see my MA Resume). That's 18 years between 1st to 6th Dan for me versus 4 for Pelligrini...
International Hapkido Alliance -Geoff Booth. Grandmaster Booth is a student of DJN Ji. I've hosted him now over 15 times and it's always a great deal of fun, with superb Hapkido and keeping everyone smiling with his jokes. Grandmaster Booth has a DVD series out that are fantastic -- great techniques, very clear, extremely well done. Of note, Beck Martial Arts is now an affiliate member of the IHA.
International Hapki Federation - Jae Nam MYONG(deceased), now named the International Hapkido Federation. Close relationships with Aikido organizations. This one is also involved in sponsoring HKD competitions. Probably the best known American associated is Marshall Gagne.
International Hapkido Federation - Bong Soo HAN Han was a student of Ji's (starting 1958) and Choi's that claims Choi as his teacher and disassociated himself from Ji many years ago. He was one of the first Hapkido instructors in the United States and is famous for the Billy Jack movies that gave Hapkido its first big visibility. He also appeared in Kentucky Fried Movie in the funniest MA related scenes ever filmed.
International Korean Martial Arts Federation - Ian Cyrus - Grandmaster Cyrus is a student of DJN Ji, GM Suh, and others, a pioneer who had achieved 9th Dan in 1989. I've trained with him several times and been very impressed. His background includes the FBI, studies of the physics of striking, and oriental medicine; and he emphasizes Socially Relevant Expression of Violence (SREV), i.e. how people express violence changes as society advances.
Korea Hapkido Association - DukKyu HWANG Hwang was Ji's first student in Seoul; his father owned the boarding house where DJN Ji was staying. The name has been changed to the Korea New Martial Art Hapkido Association.
Korean Hapkido Association - Moo Woong KIM - helped add the kicks to HKD
Korea Hapkido Federation - Se Lim OH Oh was an early student of Ji's in Andong, his first school. The KHF overall has a good reputation, with some people in it with impeccable reputations such as Hal Whalen and Holcombe Thomas. But also associated previously was Richard Hackworth., Ocee, Florida. I don't understand all the relationships but Hackworth marketed himself as the US representative for the KHF, plus had a slew of other organizations such as the National Han Moo Kwan Association and the Korean Martial Arts Instructors Association. My own experience with him was limited to buying material from him he represented as being the official KHF curriculum. But it was in fact only his requirements, which included some ridiculous things like 1 armed cartwheels. Other reputable HKD people I know of have had much worse experiences with him, including selling false certificates. He's also been in trouble for selling false Kukkiwon Taekwondo certification. I believe the KHF kicked him out in 2003 or 2004, but it took a long time after many many complaints. The point is, buyer beware; any organization can have bad apples.
Korean Martial Arts Brotherhood - This is an umbrella organization between a number of Grandmasters each with their own organizations to support sharing knowledge and training. Involved are GMs Rudy Timmerman, Geoff Booth, James MacMurray, Ian Cyrus, Serge Baubil, and Michal de Alba.
National Korean Martial Arts Association - Rudy Timmerman. Excellent reputation. GM Timmerman is a Kuk Sool and Kong Shin Bup person, a student of In Hyuk SUH, In Sun SEO and others. Based in Canada, his is an organization with a reputation for no politics and helping people learn.
World Hapkido Federation - Kwang Sik MYUNG This may be the biggest in the US. Myung was a student of Ji's (starting in 1957) that claims Choi as his teacher. Excellent training materials (books and tapes). My 2nd instructor Yon Sun Kim, was affiliated with the WHF, and so was Beck Martial Arts for many years. The reason for switching to DJN Ji's organization for certification was that I have directly studied with DJN Ji many times over more than a decade and have never had the opportunity to directly study with GM Myung.
World Kido Federation/Korea Kido Association - In Sun SEO Seo was a direct student of Choi's. This is something of an umbrella organization for non-TKD martial arts in Korea. Many Hapkido kwans are members including Rudy Timmerman's National Korean Martial Arts Association and Pelligrini's International Combat HKD Federation so it's a grab bag of people. I've been to seminars of Suh's and can directly witness to his and his direct students' expertise, although I could nit-pick a little on teaching methods. He considers himself the most senior Hapkido person still living and teaching with two exceptions: his elder brother In Hyuk SUH and Han Jae JI. He is actively creating training materials, building a strong organization, and has groomed multiple successors. He is based in California.
World Sin Moo Hapkido Association - Han Jae JI-founder of Hapkido. This is Doju-nim Ji's current organization. It is fairly small and has few training materials available, but is developing more. DJN still actively travels around the world teaching seminars; he's retired 4 or 5 times but always comes back. I've had the pleasure and privilege of hosting him several times and Beck Martial Arts is involved in his organization.
United States Hapkido Federation- Don Burns. Burns is a student of Ki-Duk Lee. This is largely a regional organization in Indiana, but has been around a long time; founded in 1980. It's non-profit with an excellent reputation. Also involved is Robert Spear, author of one of the first Hapkido books.
United States Korean Martial Arts Federation - J.R. West. I've now been to several of Grandmaster West's seminars and hosted him once and have been extremely impressed. His reputation as a superb Hapkidoman is well-deserved. The integrity, openess, and skill of this man is amazing. Train with him if you ever get the chance. He puts on a big seminar every six months in Jackson, Mississippi that attracts a lot of major Hapkido people, and his organization involves no politics; simply helping people learn the art. He is the top student of Dr. He-Young Kimm and Dr. Kimmis always there at the 6-month get-togethers and brings some of his books for sale. Good chance for autographs.
Universal Hapkido Institute - Ik Hwan KIM
Korean martial artists traditionally study under multiple people and then claim one as their teacher, supposedly the one who most influenced them. So they could study for years under Ji, go to one seminar with Choi, and claim Choi (the more famous person) as their teacher. Ji was a very young man when he first started teaching -- almost all his students were older.
Another reason is that DJN Ji is a very creative individual and would teach whatever he felt like teaching that day. When an organization sets out specific requirements for rank for instance, if he didn't follow them or he promoted someone that hadn't met those specific requirements; it caused problems. He doesn't like doing the administrative work that is necessary to run a good organization. So he'd be involved in founding a HKD organization, then would delegate the admin details, eventually there'd be some disagreement on some detail or another, and he'd leave that organization to found another one.
And DJN admits to not being very likeable when young -- he didn't really mellow and begin using the Taoist theory he put into Sin Moo HKD until after his prison term.
DJN Ji was the head of the presidential bodyguards when President Chung Hee Park's wife was killed during an attempt on the President's life. DJN Ji was out of the country on R&R at the time. DJN Ji was not the head of the bodyguards when President Park was killed in 1979. The new head bodyguard was with President Park at that time and was also killed. The assassin was the head of the Korean CIA, i.e. someone within President Park's inner circle. But Ji resigned after the assassination anyway. When he became a civilian he joined the Min Jung Dang political party, and got involved with one of two rival groups inside the party. Ji started training some people from the group to protect President Doo CHUN when he would visit party headquarters, and the leader of the other group reported to the president that secret training was going on to overthrow him. Ji received a 1-year prison term. During the term, he was unable to work out, but meditated a great deal, and when he got out started Sin Moo Hapkido.
Not much. There is a lot of variance throughout Hapkido, with a wide spread of the amounts of focus on particular types of techniques. But to be called Hapkido it should have some defenses versus all ranges and all types of attacks; and it should include kicks, strikes, throws, joint locks, and pressure points. The percentage of time spent on any particular types of techniques varies much more with the particular instructor than with a particular HKD organization or kwan. Sin Moo Hapkido has essentially the same techniques as other kinds of Hapkido. Sin Moo Hapkido adds more mental and spiritual training, with more stress on meditation and how to live your life.
It's difficult to know what the actual facts are -- even when there are written records, sometimes the writers are biased. Although I've used books, web sites, mailing lists, questions to my teachers,etc, I am not a trained historian, and I don't claim that these answers are the be all end answers to these questions. But they are MY answers to these questions based on what I've experienced, seen, and heard from multiple sources in three decades of studying martial arts. If something I say makes you mad, I'm easy to find. :)
For what it's worth, my background in Taekwondo is as a student of first GM Yong Chin Pak at Iowa State University starting in 1988, then Master Yon Sun Kim in Garland Texas for about 5 years, and ever since then GM Sun Hee-Sup Lee in Plano.
My complete martial arts background is on the MA Resume page. Most of these questions involve differing views of history. To me this is all pretty unimportant. One, both Hapkido and Taekwondo are martial arts that have changed and continue to change with the times. Two, the term 'art' in martial art implies creativity and individual expression. Every instructor teaches a little bit differently, and every student will find certain techniques just work better for them than others, so every martial art becomes an individual martial art. I can teach you my interpretation of Hapkidoand/or Taekwondo, but I encourage you to use that as a base and eventually develop your own interpretation. What matters is that you train to meet your goals, not who created that particular method of training. I have capitalized family names and used the Western approach of placing them last; you'll often see them reversed. David N. Beck, Texas
Sometimes not all that much; there has been a LOT of cross-pollinization. Virtually everyone in Korea gets some Taekwondo training (it's their national sport - ever know an American boy who'd NEVER played baseball?). The specialty jumping spinning kicks of Hapkido proved very useful for demonstration and breaking purposes and got adopted into Taekwondo. Any Hosinsool (self-defense) techniques involving joint locks or throws you see in Taekwondo got adopted in from out of Hapkido. Even though TKD is more known for kicking than HKD, HKD has a wider variety of kicks. But on the flip side, any HKDists that want to spar tend to do so under TKD rules and adapt their techniques accordingly. There's a lot of mixed versions out there; although typically a LOT heavier on the TKD side; TKD is easier to learn and easier to market. Go far enough in either and you'll learn some of the other one, so how much does it really matter? In general, if sport oriented, it's Taekwondo; and if self-defense oriented,it's Hapkido.
Essentially politics, what set of forms are done, and what rules of sparring are followed. Really all these arts come from the same background, the Koreans that studied Japanese/OkinawinKarate and opened schools (Kwans) after World War II that (mostly) cooperated with each other to achieve more success.
Kong Soo Do =Korean pronounciation for karate-do. Tang Soo Do = Korean pronounciationfor way of the Tang hand. Karate Do = Okinawin way of the Kara (Tang dynasty Chinese) hand.
Of the arts pronounced 'tie kwahn doe', if they're spelled: Taekwondo - probably World Taekwondo Federation, with the kind of sparring you'll see in the Olympics, the largest organization Taekwon-do - probably InternationalTaekwon-do Federation, following Hong Hi Choi Tae Kwon Do - probably with one of the small federations, an independent, and probably calling themselves 'traditional' with little changes in the last 50 years. All of these are kicking/punching arts that have placed more stress on the kicking aspects than did their forebears. How much stress is placed on competition, sparring, forms, etc in a particular school varies much more with the particular instructor than with what it's called or what organization the school is affiliated with.
No. It's true people have always been fighting, and some have always been better at it, and some taught others passing down techniques from generation to generation. There are cave murals in Korea from ~50 BC showing men in poses that *MIGHT* be from a martial art, although to an unbiased observer they look more like they are dancing. There are historical references to the Hwarang- a group of young Silla noblemen - practicing a kicking punching art called 'soo bakh' during the 3 kingdoms (Koguro, Paekje,Silla) period of Korean history, well before the trip in 520 AD of the famous Buddist monk Bodhitsuharma from India to the Shaolin temple that began the development of kung fu. And the Paekje royalty (the losing side) moved to Japan when the Korean peninsula was conquered by Silla in 668, possibly becoming the Japanese culture. (Japan means 'land of the rising sun', which is how it'd be seen from Korea.) So it's *conceivable* that systematic martial arts arose first in Korea. But the evidence is pretty scant. In any case, the Yi dynasty (1392-1910) strongly discouraged any sort of martial art during the time that kung fu was spreading through China and becoming karate in Okinawa. Between that and the Japanese occupation of Korea from 1909-1945, indigenous Korean arts were lost. It is conceivable that some were practiced in secret, and many historical records*were* lost in the Korean War, but realistically, *all* the founders of the Kwans that cooperated to form Taekwondo had studied Japanese/Okinawin martial arts, and that is what they taught. Claims of having studied Soo Bakh, Korean royal court martial arts, Tae Kyon, or with some monk up in the hills in secret with techniques passed down through 50+ generations came later; after WW II was long over and it was politically expedient to sever any hint of Japanese influence.
Chung Do Kwan - founded in 1944 by Won KyukLEE who'd studied Shotokan karate and called his art Tang Soo Do.
Moo Duk Kwan -founded in 1945 by Hwang KEE. Kee had studied Tai Chi and some types of Kung Fu with Kuk Jin YANG in China and opened a school. His first two attempts were unsuccessful, he then met with Won Kyuk Lee and visited the Chung Do Kwon periodically. Lee claims Kee was his student,Kee says that is not true, KukJin Yang was his only teacher. Kee says he learned the Shotokan forms from GichinFunakoshi's books. Kee started teaching the Shotokan forms and his school became successful. Kee was close friends with some noted Japanese karate people as well. Regardless of the source of his skills, what Kee taught was obviously very influenced by Japanese karate.Kee originally called his art HwaSoo Do, then Tang Soo Do, then Soo Bakh Do.
Song Moo Kwan - founded in 1944 by Byung Jick RO, who'd studied Shotokan karate and called his art Tang Soo Do. His first school closed within a few months, but he was able to reopen in 1946 after WW 2 ended the Japanese occupation of Korea.
Kwon Bop Bu/Chang Moo Kwan - founded in 1947 by Byungin YOON who had studied Chinese kung fu (chu'an-fa,or 'fist law') in Manchuria and Shudokan karate with Kanken Toyama in Japan, originally called Kwon Bop Kong Soo Do (meaning fist method of karate). Yoon disappeared during the Korean War. Yoon's teachings were carried on by his top student Nam Suk LEE, who changed the name of the school to Chang Moo Kwan.
Yun Moo Kwan - founded in 1946 by Kyung Suk LEE (judo) and Sang Sup CHUN (karate), called originally Choson Yun Moo Kwan (The Choson Yun MooKwan had been the original Japanese Judo school in Korea for over 30 years previous ly). Lee became missing and Chun died during the Korean War, and this kwan essentially became the Ji Do Kwan.
Ji Do Kwan/Chi Do Kwan - founded in 1953 by Dr. Kwa-Byung YUN, who had studied Shito-Ryu karate in Japan. Yun became the head of the Chosun Yun Moo Kwan after its leaders were lost and renamed it.
O Do Kwan - founded in 1954 by Hong Hi CHOI, offshoot from Chung Do Kwan
Jung Do Kwan - founded in 1954 by Yong Woo LEE, offshoot from Chung Do Kwan
Han Moo Kwan - founded by Kyo Yoon LEE in1956, offshoot from Yun Moo Kwan
Kang Duk Kwan - founded in 1956 by Chul Hee PARK offshoot from the Kwan Bop Bu Kwan.
Hong Moo Kwan - founded by Jong Pyo HONG, offshoot from the Kwan Bop Bu.
Again, *every* founder of the original kwans had studied or been heavily influenced by some sort of karate.
It is no disservice to TKD to admit that it is not 2000 years old and came primarily from karate. Karate came from kung fu. Kung fu came from whatever Indian art Bodhitsuharma studied before travelling to the Shaolin temple. All have developed into something quite different from their source.
There is no single person who deserves credit as the founder. (Major) General Hong Hi CHOI claimed to be. But in reality taekwondo is the result of many people working together to resolve their differences and develop and promote a unified Korean martial art.
Because he (supposedly) came up with the name, was the head of the Korea Taekwondo Association (which later became the World Taekwondo Federation), did much to spread the art throughout the Korean military and the world, and (supposedly) created the Chang Hon forms used in many of the TKD organizations.
I would say that Choi deserves a certain amount of credit for spreading the art, and that he could legitimately call himself the founder of the Oh Do Kwan and of arts that spell themselves as Taekwon-do and belong to the ITF, but he was not the only person involved even in his own kwan, and he certainly was NOT the founder of the majority of arts that call themselves 'tie kwan doe'. He was given an HONORARY 4th Dan ranking by Duk Song SON, the 2nd head of the Chung Do Kwan in 1955 at the request of Tae Hi NAM, which was rescinded by Son in a statement published on 6/15/59 in the Seoul Shinmoon newspaper.
Bear with me, this gets confusing. The founders of the first five kwans had tried and failed to form an association between World War II and the Korean War. On April 11, 1955 Choi presided at a naming committee meeting at which 'tae kwon do' was first proposed. Duk Sung SON says that he passed a piece of paper to Choi suggesting it and Choi took credit for it. No one other than those two would really know. Regardless, although the committee accepted the name, the kwans did not, because only the Chung Do Kwan and Oh Do Kwan (a Chung Do Kwan offshoot) were represented at the meeting. Most of the other kwans wanted to use the name Kong Soo Do. During the war a Korea Kong Soo Do Association was formed by most of the kwan heads. But Hwang Kee (Moo Duk Kwan founder) left and formed his own Korea Tang Soo Do Association,later renaming it Korea Soo BakhDo Association. Choi in 1959 created a Korea Taekwondo Association but again there was lots of political infighting (there were 14 kwans by this time), and despite the desire to unify all the kwans were basically doing their own thing. The Ministry of Defense requested that a single organization be formed, and finally in September 1961 a series of unification meetings were held. The compromise name 'tae soodo' was agreed on (tae from taekwondo, soo from kong soodo), and the Korea Tae Soo Do Association was created. This time the unification took, despite Hwang Kee again leaving after a while to do his own thing. (So you have Moo Duk Kwan TKD and Moo Duk Kwan Tang Soo Do and Moo DukKwan Soo Bakh Do organizations depending on who stayed or split along with Hwang Kee and when.) Finally TKD had the organization it needed to become the national sport of Korea.
During all this time Choi was in charge of teaching for the entire military (ie EVERY able-bodied male) and grew a lot in political power. When Choi became president of the KTA in 1965, he was able to get its name changed to the Korean Taekwondo Association (which is NOT the same as Choi's Korea Taekwondo Association.) So you had 3 different KTAs, none existing at the same time!
Circa 1966 Choi formed the International Taekwon-Do Federation and left Korea and the KTA, and eventually in 1973 the KTA changed its format,essentially becoming the World Taekwondo Federation. (Actually the Korean TKD Association still exists as a national governing body for TKD in Korea; the World TKD Federation is the worldwide parent organization and each country has its own national governing body. In the U.S. this is USA Taekwondo, formerly the United States Taekwondo Union.)
So, whether he originated the term or not, Choi's political muscle *is* the reason we call it 'tie kwan do' instead of Kong Soo Do or Tae Soo Do.
The Chang Hon set of forms one in the ITF *may* have come from Choi, but more likely come from Tae Hi NAM, who had much more experience and training in the martial arts than Choi, his commanding officer. Nam is the person that performed the break of 13 roofing tiles that so impressed President Syngman Rhee in 1952 that he ordered the study of Tae Kwon Do by all Korean military personnel. With Choi in charge of the TKD training in the military, that set of forms spread widely,and they are seen in many of today's TKD organizations. Choi's introduction of the 'sine wave' type of movement into the ITF forms circa 1980 is particular to the ITF.
In their forms the ITF practice a little up and down motion that adds power to their punching techniques. Generally it doesn't carry over to their sparring because adding the upward motion slows the technique and telegraphs what's coming. The downward motion is the same kind of 'sinking' technique many Chinese styles do, the idea being rooting to the ground and letting gravity help you add power. It's not a new idea, but the emphasis they place on it is not seen in any other versions of Taekwondo.
When it started it was basically the same. As the years have passed, it has placed more and more stress on developing kicking and sparring skills and sporting aspects of the art, the forms have changed, teaching methods have changed... The most obvious difference is that modern TKD has a greater variety of and stress on kicks.
Tae-kyon is a native Korean kicking based martial art in which contests were held by common people in the same way that boxing matches were held at English country fairs.But it was associated with uneducated peasants and undesirable activities such as revenge fights, and was made illegal during the Japanese occupation. It almost died out completely, being reduced to a single known master in the 1950's, Duk Ki SON. Its existance made the name Taekwondo more attractive than some of the other names such as Tang Soo Do or Kong Soo Do because of anti-Japanese feeling. Currently there has been a resurgence of Tae-kyon in Korea all coming from Son, who's been declared a cultural asset by the government. Many TKD 'histories' now claim that the kwanfounders had all studied Tae Kyon or use it as a different name for soo bakh. But they're almost certainly revisionist; from the examples I've seen most of the techniques are sweeps, reaps, kicks to unbalance, and throat strikes. The techniques differ from those in TKD.
Technically, there tends to be more kicking and competition emphasis in WTF Taekwondo, and more forms emphasis in ITF Taekwon-do.
In size, the World Taekwondo Federation is much bigger, with many more people involved worldwide all committed to spreading the art. WTF schools vary widely in what forms are practiced, how much stress is given to self-defense versus competition, testing requirements, etc. Its history is that of tolerating differences and sharing credit. The ITF is a small (although worldwide) organization driven by one man, who made sure the entire organization did the same forms in the same way. Since Choi's death the ITF has started to splinter, with several different people claiming to be in charge.
Politically, Choi has received much criticism for his trips to North Korea and support of the Communist dictator Il Jung KIM. In particular Choi's creation and use of the 'Juche' form is onerous, because Kim's political ideal of 'juche(self-reliance)' has been blamed for the starvation deaths of millions in North Korea, which refused all humanitarian aid for years.